SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS: LETTER OF INTENT CREATES NO BINDING RIGHTS

The Supreme Court, in State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors vs. Oasys Cybernatics (24 Nov 2025), reaffirmed that a Letter of Intent (“LoI”) is merely a “promise in embryo” and does not create binding rights unless all stipulated preconditions mentioned in the LoI are fulfilled. The Court upheld the State’s cancellation of the LoI due to persistent non-compliance, and set aside the High Court’s direction to proceed on the basis of the LoI. While recognising the State’s administrative discretion, the Court permitted the initiation of a fresh tender process, clarifying that the bidder remains free to participate. It also ordered quantum meruit reimbursement for devices or services actually utilised during pilot phases.

The Petitioners were represented by A.S.A., led by Mr. P. Chidambaram, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Arman Roop Sharma, Mrs. Shimpy Sharma, Mohd. Aman Khan Afghani and Ms. Yeshasvi Srivastava. The team’s comprehensive record-based submissions and structured arguments were instrumental in securing clarity on the legal effect of LoIs, judicial restraint, and equitable restitution in tender processes.

Disclaimer

The Bar Council of India does not permit advertisement or solicitation by advocates/law firms in any form or manner. The website of ASA is solely meant for information about the Firm, its practice areas, advocates and solicitors and not for the purpose of advertising, soliciting work or inducement of any sort by the Firm or any of its members. The contents of the website are not to be construed as legal advice. ASA is not to be held liable for consequences of any action taken on the basis of the material/information provided on this website.                           

The contents of this website are the intellectual property of the firm.